Jul 242015

I don’t want to pick on Societe Generale analyst Robin Bhar, as this was representative of most of the commentary around China’s gold reserves announcement, but the statement that the 1,658 tonne figure “was not unexpected. If anything, it was slightly surprising that it wasn’t more, the market was looking at a figure north of 2,000 tonnes” makes the mistake of assuming that Central Bank announcements are about communicating facts.

As Ben Hunt says, Central Bankers “are all playing the Common Knowledge Game as hard as they can … if you don’t listen to what is being said in the context of game-playing, then you are placed at a disadvantage versus those who do. You will not understand the WHY that exists behind the public statements.”

So what is the WHY driving China’s gold reserves announcement? This note from Ben argues that “Chinese political stability under the unified coalition formed by Deng Xiaoping depends on robust and real domestic economic growth” and that “will depend on developed world export markets in the US and Europe”. That objective is not advanced by having a strengthening currency, making China’s exports more expensive, or as some goldbugs fantasise, “withdrawing from the system or blowing the system up” by reverting to a gold standard. But China cannot also dramatically weaken its currency lest it provoke Western governments into an overt currency war.

In terms of the why I think the timing, or WHEN, of the announcement was also significant.

It is also important to understand the audience the message is directed at, in other words the WHO. Ben notes that political linguistic game-playing often involves messages directed at multiple audiences, otherwise known as dog-whistling. In the case of the China gold reserves announcement, the choice of the figure revealed and how it was explained would have been a delicate, strategic balancing act considering the different perspectives of the players involved. Lets consider each of these audiences.

WHO – Foreign Governments and Central Bankers

Jim Rickards summarises the message China was sending to this audience in this simple tweet “China reveals enough gold to be respectable, but not enough to disrupt. Consistent with idea they want to join the SDR club, not destroy it”. Mark O’Byrne from GoldCore also makes the point that China “could be low balling their total gold holdings – official central bank reserves and non official holdings – in order to maintain confidence in their substantial US dollar holdings and to aid their bid to join the IMF.”

As news agency Xinhua noted, “China looks to advance its currency’s status as a key international reserve currency, which is now a prime candidate for the International Monetary Fund’s (IMF) special drawing rights (SDR)”. It is also interesting in terms of “join not destroy” that the article made the point that “countries have long abandoned the gold standard as the basis of monetary systems” before acknowledging that “gold reserve volume remains an important factor in market assessment of a country’s currency”.

I also find it interesting that the Xinhua included this quote from a researcher with the Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences: “China’s increasing gold reserves will strengthen yuan holders’ confidence, which will help stabilize the exchange rate and facilitate the internationalization of the yuan”. While directed at other central bankers, possibly it was also meant to encourage domestic investors to retain their yuan, rather than buying Australian or Canadian property, for example?

In terms of not disrupting, consider the chart below which shows the Chinese gold reserves additions as a monthly average rate of accumulation.


The recent 604 tonne addition is just a bit over 8 tonnes a month, which is similar to the rate of accumulation during 2001 and 2002. The message China is sending from this chart is that they are officially accumulating gold in a predictable and slow manner.

The steady as she goes message was reinforced by the People’s Bank of China saying, as reported by Reuters, that “on the premise of not creating disturbances in the market, we steadily accumulated gold reserves through a number of international and domestic channels” and would “remain flexible when deciding whether or not to adjust gold reserves in the future” with those channels being, according to Xinhua, “domestic scrap gold, production storage and trade in domestic and overseas markets.”

The consistency on China’s accumulation is better demonstrated by charting China’s reported reserves (in red) and filling in the gaps between the reporting points (in green) with assumed monthly additions, as I have done below.


The trajectory of the gold reserves growth is so bureaucratically predictable that I feel confident in extending the chart beyond today and saying that the next Chinese reserves announcement will fall on the my forecasted official reserves line depending on the date of the announcement.

Any figure greater than this predictable path would, as David Marsh of the monetary forum OMFIF said, “risk unsettling the world gold market” and “might be interpreted as an unfriendly move against the dollar at a ‘delicate time’.”

WHO – Domestic Stock Market Investors

Zero Hedge argued that “China had to wait until its stock market was crashing to present the ‘systemic stability’ bazooka: gold. Because in revealing a surge in its gold holdings, the PBOC is hoping to finally provide that final missing link that will boost investor sentiment, and get people buying stocks all over again.” Ross Norman from Sharps Pixley noted this argument but then said “but that makes no sense either, because they [gold reserves] aren’t!” sizeable.

Michael Kosares of USAGOLD provides a counter argument, noting that a “strong number would have propelled gold and the yuan higher – not what you might want having just thrown everything but the kitchen sink at the crashing Shanghai market. China in the end is an export economy, much like Japan. It’s stock market value relies on exports.”

I agree with Ross and Michael. Consider that the previous gold reserves announcement was in April 2009 when the amount increased from 600 tonnes to 1054 tonnes. The announcement prior to that was December 2002, which makes for a gap of 77 months. This increase being in June 2015 is a period of 75 months from the last, so one could consider this announcement should have been in August (assuming there is something special about the 77 month period). More relevant is the fact that the IMF meeting regarding the SDR will be in October, which means an August/September announcement would have sufficed.

So arguably the announcement in July about a gold reserves increase in June was early. I do not think it is coincidental that the announcement occurred shortly after China’s stock market fall. As the Chinese authorities would have been aware that market expectations were for a larger number, the reporting of a modest number sent a message to Chinese investors that while gold is important, it is not a major asset class and certainly not more important than the stock market. Reporting a large number would have sent the message that China was favouring gold and was the better asset to invest in.

Knowing that a lower than expectations figure would likely be negative for gold prices, China may well have considered it fortuitous that the gold price was weak at the same time they wanted to encourage people to invest in the stock market. As Jim Rickards tweeted “China is still buying gold and favors a lower price. So, timing the big ‘reveal’ for when gold prices are weak anyway makes perfect sense”, both for the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) in terms of acquiring more gold and for discouraging domestic investors from shifting money from the stock market to gold.

WHO – Domestic Gold Consumers

For those without the wealth to invest in the stock market or property, gold represents a culturally familiar way to save. For this average consumer, the Chinese government would want to send a message that gold was still an acceptable investment, which the increasing of gold reserves achieves.

As mentioned above, the announcement also ensured that the gold price would not increase dramatically. The Chinese government would consider that essential, as a high gold price limits how much gold domestic consumers can accumulate, and could be seen by them as breaking the deal where the government can retain political power in exchange for individual economic improvement.

In this SAFE Q&A from 2010 they say that gold “has a very limited market capacity” and “if we buy gold on a large scale, the international price of gold will definitely be pushed up” which would “end up hurting the interests of our domestic consumers”.

This position was reiterated by Huang Guobo, Chief Economist at SAFE, in 2014 in this answer to a question about whether SAFE is “gold bargain-hunting”:

  1. “China now has a rational structure with both official gold reserves and active holding and purchase of gold among the people. Hence, the policy of ‘gold held by the people’ has been well achieved”
  2. “investment of foreign exchange reserves will have a significant influence on the gold market … if the price of gold is pushed up, then people will have to pay more for gold … which will be unfavorable in terms of our high consumption of gold”
  3. “when planning to invest foreign exchange reserves in the gold market, we must take into consideration its influence on the market and whether it will be beneficial for consumer groups in China that import a large quantity of gold”

Finally, consider what the PBOC itself said on Friday: “with an on-going policy of encouraging gold ownership by private individuals. It’s important to continue and consider the future of private investment demand as well as keeping international reserve asset allocation a flexible operation.” As Adrian Ash of Bullion Vault commented, “private gold demand … remains a key consideration for the People’s Bank when deciding its own gold-buying activity”, a case of “the state growing its own involvement, but letting private citizens take the lion’s share”.

With such a policy encouraging domestic gold accumulation, the gold reserves announcement helps to modestly reaffirm gold’s role and maintain a “favourable” gold price.

WHO – Foreign Gold Investors

As the Chinese government wants its population to accumulate gold (as well as itself), it would have been interested in coming under market consensus of how much gold it had. For the less game theory savvy Westerners who took the figure on face value, it would be read as bearish. For others, like

  • Joni Teves at UBS Group: “China hasn’t been very open about its strategy, so what matters now is whether the market believes they intend to continue buying … They do appear to leave the door open to further purchases, which should limit the downside for gold”
  • Georgette Boele at ABN Amro Bank: “Their motivation is reserve diversification, and they’ll probably keep buying”

the lower figures, while confirming that China will still be in the market, would not necessarily be bullish as these analyst and professional market players would have already incorporated that information into their calculations. The result is that there was little downside for China to report a lower figure given a higher figure may well have resulted in a large amount of retail Western investor buying.

WHERE – location and encumberance

The above discussion covers the Why and Who but I’d like to finish with some comments on the Where. Ronan Manly notes that there are two questions that no one has raised about the gold reserves announcement: “the storage locations of China’s official gold reserves and whether the gold is unencumbered”.

In respect of the encumbrance question, this is how gold is described in SAFE’s Template on International Reserves and Foreign Currency Liquidity (my emphasis):

Gold (including gold deposits and, if appropriate, gold swapped) – 623.97 [note this is in US$100 millions)
Volume in millions of fine troy ounces – 53.32

While no indication is given about the extent of Chinese deposits, lending or swapping, this wording does leave the door open to the possibility that China holds gold overseas, either as unallocated or allocated, or is involved in “actively managing” (as it is euphemistically referred to) its gold reserves.

As most analysts agree that China does hold more reserves than it announced last week, the question is where is this gold held? It does not mean that China was lying about its gold reserves, as costata001 tweets: “China could have bought that gold at any time in the past 30+ years. IMF rules only require reports when gold is classified as reserves i.e. monetary gold.” However, I do not think it is a case of the PBOC just changing the classification of gold it holds as monetary, given this definition by SAFE (my emphasis):

“4. Reserves assets refer to external assets that can be used at any time and are effectively controlled by the PBOC, consisting of monetary gold, special drawing rights (SDRs), the reserves position in the Fund, and foreign exchange.
4.1 Monetary gold refers to the gold held by the PBOC as reserve.”

So once gold becomes “effectively controlled” it becomes reserves. This means for the Chinese government to keep gold out of reserves it needs to keep it off the books of the PBOC. China is not unique in this regard. As Chris Powell notes, “Saudi Arabia pulled a similar trick in 2010. In June that year the World Gold Council reported that Saudi Arabia’s gold reserves had increased by 126 percent, from 143 to 323 tonnes, since 2008” but later revealed that it “had possessed that additional gold all along, holding it in what he called ‘other accounts’ but not reporting it”.

GoldCore have pointed out that in addition to the PBOC and SAFE, there are other Chinese government owned entities that may have also been buying gold, such as the China Investment Corporation or the “China National Gold Group Corporation or China Gold, China’s largest gold conglomerate with primary interests in mining and also refining”. Another location could also be the state owned banks active in the bullion market.

So when China decides that it wants to increase its gold reserves officially, it can acquire it from any of these entities. On Monday I will update this analysis from 2012 to estimate how much gold the Chinese government unofficially holds and how much the population holds, for what it is worth.

  • Zhanglan

    So what, approximately? China holds [pick a number, any number] tons of Gold – what does this signify? 1,000 tons – “They’re telling lies”. 2,000 tons – no, still not true. 5,000 tons – yes, that’s what I was expecting, so what now? 10,000 tons – hang on, if they are buying that much and the price is still going down, what is going on? 20,000 tons – no, hang on, you are really starting to scare me now! 50,000 tons – “They’re telling lies again!”

    All in all, so what? Any of the motives noted to explain the timing and the size of the declared position may be perfectly valid, but what difference does it make? – the price continues its journey back into the centre of the Earth, from whence all the Gold came from in the first place

    You are, however, spot on with the references to Ben Hunt and “The Narrative” – right now, everybody “knows” Gold is collapsing, so it is, leading to the simple “so what?” conclusion that only a fool would step in on the Bid side of the markets at these levels

    The Darkness Still Has Work to Do, and its not linked to either the Chinese economy or to Central Bank manipulation, but to extremely adverse investor sentiment, in which context perhaps the most significant part of the PBOC announcement was that the proportion of Gold to the total Foreign Exchange Reserves had actually fallen since the previous announcement. Relatively speaking, not even the PBOC likes Gold these days

    • MonetaryPerspectives

      China doesn’t want or need to be seen upsetting the apple cart (the current global financial system), but can afford to be patient, as that apple cart is shortly going to fall off the edge of a very large cliff. We bought more physical gold this week.

      • Zhanglan

        Holding Gold as part of a diversified investment portfolio is a prudent move; as Keith Weiner correctly points out, the nominal market value of that Gold at any given time is a poor indicator of its value, and only of interest if your intention is to re-convert into $ at some stage; and it is rarely possible to call the bottom of a market, or consistently time trades to achieve optimal efficiency. To that extent, I agree with you

        However, if we focus on marginal discretionary investment – i.e. if I find an extra $ down the back of the sofa, where should I best invest it? – then the market price dynamics become extremely relevant, for a number of reasons

        – in a falling Market, I can probably buy more Gold tomorrow than I can today

        – if I purchase a backwarded Futures contract and postpone receipt of the physical metal, then I can lock in a cheaper effective price tomorrow than I can today (albeit at the risk of being cash settled)***

        – if I invest in a different asset class altogether, then not only will my risk profile change, but I may also generate a running yield which will in turn put me in a better position to buy Gold tomorrow than I am in today

        Market dynamics over the past several years have been clear – not just Gold, but other Precious Metals and Commodities are in a downtrend, and the economic circumstances which might be expected to halt and reverse this are at best unclear or “mixed”. Many of the memes which had become fashionable over the past 3 years or so have now passed their “Sell By” dates – with the “China is Buying Gold!” trope being only one example. In my opinion, the sole remaining driving force is market sentiment, and as Bron/Ben point out, the current Narrative is unfavourable

        With this in mind, my personal opinion (and one I had an almighty challenge enforcing on junior Traders in a previous life) is that the best trade in present circumstances is to sit on your hands, and if you can’t do that, then go down to the pub and switch your phone off

        Back in the Day there was an old adage in the UK Equity markets to the effect that you should “Sell in May and Go Away and don’t come back til [$1300]” and I think that holds as true now as it ever did during the heady days of the South Sea Bubble and the DotCom debacle. And let’s face it, I should know, because my Chinese stock portfolio is still down 25.71% according to Bloomberg, which makes for depressing reading and puts $1080 in Gold into some form of perspective

        *** NB I have just been mugging up on the contract specs for the Dubai Gold & Commodities Exchange http://www.dgcx.ae/index.php/en/products/metals/gold-futures#contract-specification , and it appears that any of their metals contracts which do not generate a Delivery Notice by the Last Trading Day will be automatically cash-settled (in the case of Silver, at the London Fixing Price); this appears to give the Seller an effective Put Option on the physical. Which is interesting…… (Does Bron or anyone else know whether there is any significant demand for Dubai Good Standard 995 Kilobars?)

  • Fraser

    China has stated (many times) that it must and will increase it’s gold holdings as a percentage of reserves to equal that of Europe and the USA and then just announced (after many years of accumulation), the opposite. That China is a liar places their credibility on the same level as the price manipulators in London and New York. This comes as no surprise, BUT you can now smell the desperation from not only the bankers, but all Governments as they try to keep gold & silver out of the public’s eye and extend their fiat ponzi schemes for another month or two. Make no mistake, the Keynesian economy has hit its debt iceberg and the elites are (once again) locking the public below deck.

    • Zhanglan

      I must have missed those statements: please could you provide a link, and maybe clarify if it was the Chinese Government you were referring to, or an individual who just happened to be Chinese? And could you please say “Ponzi” again to hammer home the point?

      • Fraser

        Bron (and others) try to provide fancy reasons for China lying – but it does not hide the fact that the Chinese Government are just another bunch of LIARS – and whoever believes another word they say is an idiot.

        • Zhanglan

          so, no link then, even though “China has stated (many times)”.

          Odd that.

          • Shavi Tupyraz

            Fraser. Clearly you are an unhappy person. What is your preferable outcome from all this nonsense? If China told the truth, what difference do you anticipate it would it be making? If we all agree with you that this whole Ponzi is a charade, what do you intend that we should collectively do to restore Justice in this World? And if none of these dreams are achievable, why do you wish to continue investing in precious materials? Please thankyou for your kind attention, S.T. (Mrs), Chennai, India

          • Fraser

            You might be onto something Shavi – Government dishonesty makes me unhappy – but also curious that it doesn’t effect others the same way.

          • Shavi Tupyraz

            I am after asking you fourfold questions, but you are not giving any of four answerings. This is most frustrating. Could there be the possibility that you are not really into having any answers, just an impotent little rant? Please thankyou, S.T.

        • http://goldchat.blogspot.com/ Bron Suchecki

          I think you have missed the whole point about my post and the idea of narratives. Of course China is not reporting their true gold position, this is not a revelation, what matters is why did they say what they said.

          As to the “must and will increase it’s gold holdings” I cannot remember seeing any such comments by PBOC or other similarly positioned people making such statements. I think there may have been opinion pieces from people from China Gold Association or universities, but these do not represent official government policy.
          Just because someone from an organisation owned by the Chinese government makes some statement doesn’t make it official. It would be like arguing that what I write here is official policy of the Western Australian government.

          • Fraser

            Bron, I did enjoy your article, my frustration is that instead of analysing the NUMBERS and matching those to (for example) Koos Jansen’s work on the cumulative withdrawals from the SGE, we instead have to analyse “The MESSAGE behind the announcement”. And even if that can be done successfully, we now have to second guess what this Government might say and do next and why.

            Indeed, under what socio-economic conditions might they actually tell the truth? Silence is always better than blurting out a lie under stress.

            Finally, I know that I have read (official, translated) articles relating to the importance of increasing gold as a percentage of reserves. But please allow me more than a couple of hours, before declaring that such articles could not possibly exist.

          • Douglas Crets

            Um… welcome to China? Dude, this is what China does. To be good at the parsing and analyzing is to be rich!

  • JanNieuwenhuijs

    For what it’s worth: just before the announcement of the PBOC the SGE released ‘new swap rules’ http://www.en.sge.com.cn/news-announcement/announcement/526106.shtml The Safe Deposit Box rules are maybe interesting (re ‘withdrawals’), though I couldn’t make much of it. The SGE told me SDB activity does not interfere with ‘withdrawals’ activity (as in, SDBs are an OTC sideshow).

  • Pingback: The message behind the Chinese gold reserves announcement | Tatumba.com()

  • Pingback: The Doom Collective &raquo The message behind the Chinese gold reserves announcement()

  • Pingback: July 27/Chinese demand for gold in latest week rises to 69 tonnes/so far this year 1366 tonnes for 7 months/Greek banks are in shambles/ECB will not let Greece stock exchange open/Poland and Czech republic say no to the Euro!! |()

  • Pingback: ccn2785xdnwdc5bwedsj4wsndb()